UPS Agreement Ratified

[OT+]

Home X (11).png UPS Agreement Ratified

[Koldiww]

The contract passed, it was a decent agreement, not historic unless one is speaking about the historic lack of pension, or the historic amount of money paid to PR firms to get it ratified! The economics were good but in no way spectacular. Many agreements are coming in with " the largest increase ever" as the environment demands no less. So a B on money!
By the way, did I miss the number of members who voted? Was it over 50% because of the multi-million dollar push to get the Yes vote out?
just some idle thoughts...

[The Direct Line]

There were 260,335 eligible voters, of which 151,231 cast a ballot, representing 58.1% of the eligible voters. We have around 340,000 UPS Teamsters, So if we have 340,000 UPS Teamsters and 151,231 voted = 188,769 did not vote.

[JayCee]

Many people (JohnnyG) are questioning the integrity of the whole voting process

[Thisischange?]

• 
  #2.1
  The Direct Line commented
  Today, 12:17 AM
  There were 260,335 eligible voters, of which 151,231 cast a ballot, representing 58.1% of the eligible voters. We have around 340,000 UPS Teamsters, So if we have 340,000 UPS Teamsters and 151,231 voted = 188,769 did not vote.

So once again we have numbers claimed by the OZifers and then actual numbers. Assuming the 260,000 were members in good standing there could be another 10,000 or so disqualified for various reasons that would mean 68,000 were the non union non eligible right to work people? All this is guess work but either someone is puffing up numbers or there's a shitload of people that need to be signed up.

[Faust]

• 
  #2.1
  The Direct Line commented
  Today, 12:17 AM
  There were 260,335 eligible voters, of which 151,231 cast a ballot, representing 58.1% of the eligible voters. We have around 340,000 UPS Teamsters, So if we have 340,000 UPS Teamsters and 151,231 voted = 188,769 did not vote.

So once again we have numbers claimed by the OZifers and then actual numbers. Assuming the 260,000 were members in good standing there could be another 10,000 or so disqualified for various reasons that would mean 68,000 were the non union non eligible right to work people? All this is guess work but either someone is puffing up numbers or there's a shitload of people that need to be signed up.

Chicago 705 and 710 have not been counted.

[JT67]

The contract passed, it was a decent agreement, not historic unless one is speaking about the historic lack of pension, or the historic amount of money paid to PR firms to get it ratified! The economics were good but in no way spectacular. Many agreements are coming in with " the largest increase ever" as the environment demands no less. So a B on money!
By the way, did I miss the number of members who voted? Was it over 50% because of the multi-million dollar push to get the Yes vote out?
just some idle thoughts...

If you and Haffa would have worked harder on the last 4 agreements then we wouldn’t be here. You both got in because your fathers. This nepotism stuff needs to get out of the Teamsters