Big Deal: Glacier can seek Damages US Supreme Court 8-1 decision - Forum by Three Retired Teamsters

Big Deal: Glacier can seek Damages US Supreme Court 8-1 decision

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OT+
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 2367

    #1

    Big Deal: Glacier can seek Damages US Supreme Court 8-1 decision

    The ruling means Glacier Northwest Inc. can sue over its claim that wet concrete loaded onto trucks was rendered useless after workers walked off the job.
  • Barry455
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2023
    • 148

    #2
    Does this mean we'll be sending a few $million more of our dues money to Rick Hicks?

    Comment


    • The Direct Line
      The Direct Line commented
      Editing a comment
      Sounds like we are. It is more troubling because how the anti-union law firms took this case and took advantage of a conservative court.
  • OT+
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 2367

    #3
    (WASHINGTON) – The following is a statement from Teamsters General President Sean M. O’Brien on the Supreme Court’s ruling today in Glacier Northwest, Inc

    Comment

    • Gimliboston9
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2023
      • 320

      #4
      When O’Brien gave him a million dollars of our dues money do you think this is what he had in mind ?

      Comment

      • Koldiww
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2023
        • 191

        #5
        Thank Teamster walking liability hicks for this case,, after he failed the members twice, costing them 6 months, and then failed them again, now besides being a rip roaring alcoholic, (mostly on the members dime) a known and documented ego maniac, and a lying informant who lied under oath, he has now cost the entire labor movement injury and has done more harm . Oh, and OBrian , and Zuckerman gave him $1,000,000 as a phony reward for his irresponsive behavior. Rumor has it that Oz wants to dump this embarrassing excuse for a Teamster, and for a human being.

        Comment

        • Faust
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2023
          • 910

          #6
          OZ gave handed out that $1 million check like Halloween candy during the strike Hicks lost.

          Comment

          • Tpost
            Member
            • May 2023
            • 74

            #7
            FYI: Here's the SCOTUS opinion.

            Comment

            • UPS909Strong
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2023
              • 283

              #8
              Horrible decision. Can't believe it was an 8-1 ruling

              Comment


              • The Direct Line
                The Direct Line commented
                Editing a comment
                Exactly, only one judge dissented. That is scary, How many more anti-labor/pro-business cases are going to be taken to the Supreme Court.
            • UPS909Strong
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2023
              • 283

              #9
              https://thehill.com/regulation/court...rs-strike/amp/

              Comment

              • Guest

                #10
                Terrible set back.

                Comment

                • Tpost
                  Member
                  • May 2023
                  • 74

                  #11
                  Rick Hicks has never recovered from Hoffa’s decision not to allow him to replace Rome Aloise following Rome’s suspension. And even though Hicks supported Hoffa … and Rome in 2016, sour grapes won out in the end as Hicks sided with O’Brien, TDU and Judge Jones to kick Rome out of the IBT. O’Brien rewarded Hicks with $1 million to soften the failed 6-month ready mix strike and, of course the recent failure at the US Supreme Court. I wonder how much O’Brien will give Hicks if he helps suspend or ban Local 117 Secretary-Treasurer John Scearcy?

                  Comment

                  • Thisischange?
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2023
                    • 676

                    #12
                    Originally posted by Gimliboston9
                    When O’Brien gave him a million dollars of our dues money do you think this is what he had in mind ?
                    Gotta be smarter than this. Let's stop thinking in the 60's and operating in 23's.

                    Comment

                    • The Direct Line
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2023
                      • 221

                      #13


                      Came across this article.

                      Comment


                      • Tpost
                        Tpost commented
                        Editing a comment
                        There are three comments following the Nation's article: the last one hits the nail on the head. It suggests that Hicks could have prevented all this by simply withholding the Teamsters labor BEFORE the trucks were loaded, instead of waiting until AFTER they were loaded. Local 174 Secretary-Treasurer Rick Hicks - if he was any kind of leader at all - should have realized the liability involved in his ego-stroking, tough-guy tactics; then again, who said Hicks was any kind of leader.
                    • Teamster4Life
                      Member
                      • Apr 2023
                      • 68

                      #14
                      Originally posted by The Direct Line
                      Yes, there's more to come. All the tough talk and tough-guy bs from the Rick Hicks of this Union won't address the challenges ahead, we need intelligent leadership.

                      Rick Hicks will help decide the fate of Local 117 a union he's always viewed and treated like the enemy. Pure jealousy, Hicks should be removed from any part of that issue just for starters.

                      Comment


                      • Jazzman
                        Jazzman commented
                        Editing a comment
                        Hicks only cares about Hicks. Did O'Brien appoint him to a hearing panel about Searcy and Smith at Local 117? He shouldn't be anywhere near 117.

                      • The Direct Line
                        The Direct Line commented
                        Editing a comment
                        I wonder if, when you become a union official you also become jealous and insecure. It seems to be a pattern with alotta these position holders aka union officials
                    • Faust
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2023
                      • 910

                      #15
                      Originally posted by Teamster4Life

                      Yes, there's more to come. All the tough talk and tough-guy bs from the Rick Hicks of this Union won't address the challenges ahead, we need intelligent leadership.

                      Rick Hicks will help decide the fate of Local 117 a union he's always viewed and treated like the enemy. Pure jealousy, Hicks should be removed from any part of that issue just for starters.
                      Direct Line, they are called hofficers.

                      Comment

                      Working...