NLRB Rules against #399 and #492 - Forum by Three Retired Teamsters

NLRB Rules against #399 and #492

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OT+
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 2378

    #1

    NLRB Rules against #399 and #492

    Screenshot 2024-12-24 at 3.29.00 PM.jpg
    NLRB Rules against #399 and #492
  • Thisischange?
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 679

    #2
    Does this mean the Dickstepper stepped on hers?

    Comment

    • AlJackson1962!
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2024
      • 341

      #3
      I have not read the decision, however, the longstanding reality of Teamsters being denied work opportunities if they actively oppose the activities of their elected and appointed representatives in our Union has been around a long time. It sucks. To deny a Brother or Sister a days' pay is a tactic of bosses, not Union leaders. The history of this fact I know personally all too well, directed at rank and file members that refuse to shut up. And our Union s not a Union until those "leaders" are thrown out of the way.

      Comment

      • Opus Dei
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2023
        • 140

        #4
        I'm glad people are finally realizing what a shit head this lady really is. She is the worst of the worst.

        Comment


        • The Direct Line
          The Direct Line commented
          Editing a comment
          I have not seen her around until last week when SOB was at City of Industry for the Amazon picket line. When you're an ozzicers and SOB is in town you must show up and kiss the ring.

        • Opus Dei
          Opus Dei commented
          Editing a comment
          She was not around to take pictures with SOB, i think the honeymoon is over. He is realizing what a worthless shithead she is

        • Faust
          Faust commented
          Editing a comment
          Come on guys, she's just misunderstood!

        • Gimliboston9
          Gimliboston9 commented
          Editing a comment
          If you remember O’Brien’s post of a man with a gun to the head of a woman ( taken down within hours) about not trusting someone you thought to be a friend . It was speculated that he was referring to the dickstepper.

        • The Direct Line
          The Direct Line commented
          Editing a comment
          Yup no photo of her at the picket line, she is now persona non grata.

        • WTF891
          WTF891 commented
          Editing a comment
          Rumor has it she's opening a tattoo shop for her next career, and a bulimia treatment center next door. Dickstepper has a plan.
      • Wiggy
        Member
        • Apr 2023
        • 89

        #5
        Did a quick search here, haven't seen much of Dickstepper since this was posted.

        Comment


        • Gimliboston9
          Gimliboston9 commented
          Editing a comment
          Rumor is her position on Oz slate will be vacant along with Palmer and Wright. Wonder if O’Brien is getting nervous about Perron and Campos also?
          Who knows? By then his career as a podcaster or Fox News host may be in full swing. Unless Trump gives him an “offer he can’t refuse”!
      • Thisischange?
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2023
        • 679

        #6
        Originally posted by AlJackson1962!
        I have not read the decision, however, the longstanding reality of Teamsters being denied work opportunities if they actively oppose the activities of their elected and appointed representatives in our Union has been around a long time. It sucks. To deny a Brother or Sister a days' pay is a tactic of bosses, not Union leaders. The history of this fact I know personally all too well, directed at rank and file members that refuse to shut up. And our Union s not a Union until those "leaders" are thrown out of the way.
        This is so common in the movies along with the personal enrichment of the stewards who own and lease equipment, hire their friends and relatives while Teamsters sit at home.

        Comment

        • Cali News
          Member
          • Mar 2024
          • 95

          #7
          If what is said in this article is true, why didn’t they just show up to an NLRB hearing. Seems completely idiotic not to.

          Comment

        • Ron Dans
          Member
          • Jul 2023
          • 41

          #8
           

          Comment

          • Opus Dei
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2023
            • 140

            #9
            Originally posted by Thisischange?

            This is so common in the movies along with the personal enrichment of the stewards who own and lease equipment, hire their friends and relatives while Teamsters sit at home.
            It's not so much stewards that own equipment it's the coordinators that own all the equipment and rent it out to the shows they are running and also hire their friends

            Comment


            • Gimme_Danger
              Gimme_Danger commented
              Editing a comment
              I didn't think that was allowed? Some people in New England went to jail for that about 20 years ago.
          • Cali News
            Member
            • Mar 2024
            • 95

            #10
            It was also said in the article that 399 was only attached to the decision because they recently took charge of that industry in New Mexico. Did Dogherty even have anything to do with this? What was the reason for not showing up to the hearing?

            Comment

            Working...