Port Drivers Reject Teamsters 165 - 76

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sasquatch16
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 104

    Port Drivers Reject Teamsters 165 - 76

    Port Drivers Reject Teamsters As Impounded Ballots Opened
    By Beverly Banks · 2023-03-20 16:24:26 -0400 · Listen to article
    Port drivers at a transportation and logistics company in California voted against unionizing with two Teamsters locals after the National Labor Relations Board granted the unions' bid to open ballots that were previously impounded.

    According to an NLRB tally of the votes Friday, Teamsters Locals 848 and 542 lost a representation election with STG Cartage LLC port drivers at facilities in Commerce, California, and San Diego, voting 165-76 against the unions. There were 19 challenged ballots and 12 voided ballots, which would not be enough to affect the outcome of the election. The ballots had been impounded since July 15, 2022, according to board filings.

    On March 10, the NLRB granted the locals' request to open and count the ballots, saying STG Cartage's bid to keep the ballots impounded is a form of "extraordinary relief" under board rules.

    "We find that the employer has not shown that impoundment is necessary under the particular circumstances of this case," the board said.

    The locals urged the board in February to open the ballots, which were impounded under the board's recently vacated agency rule. The NLRB's 2019 election rule automatically impounded ballots when a request for review is filed.

    STG Cartage filed a request for review of NLRB Region 21 director William B. Cowen's decision in June to allow port drivers to proceed with the representation election vote. The board granted STG's request for review in July.

    In its AFL-CIO v. NLRB decision, the D.C. Circuit partly reversed the election rule in January, saying the impoundment provision violated Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act . Under Section 3(b), the NLRB's review of a regional director's decision can't be a stay of a regional director's actions "unless specifically ordered by the board."

    Impounding ballots is a stay of the regional director's counting of the votes, according to the appeals court's decision.

    The Teamsters filed a representation election petition in January 2022, when the employer's name was listed as XPO Logistics Cartage LLC. In March 2022, STG Logistics bought the intermodal division of XPO Logistics, according to board filings, and STG later changed the name of XPO Logistics Cartage LLC to STG Cartage LLC.

    Following the D.C. Circuit's ruling this year, the locals said the board should order the immediate opening of the ballots. But STG Cartage challenged the request in February, arguing the board still had the power to impound the ballots under Section 3(b).

    At the heart of the dispute between the Teamsters and STG Cartage is whether the port drivers are employees who can unionize under the NLRA. The Teamsters have been advocating on behalf of port drivers for many years and have been organizing these workers.

    STG Cartage said in its motion to impound that the board should have first ruled whether the drivers are employees or independent contractors who don't have unionizing rights under the act.

    In a March 6 reply brief, STG Cartage said opening the ballots could create a "false expectation of potential union representation" that could "damage the board's reputation for impartiality by giving the impression that it has prejudged the threshold issue of voting eligibility."

    STG Cartage said the Teamsters painted "an exaggerated picture of the burden" necessary for impounding ballots in a voter eligibility spat.

    The International Brotherhood of Teamsters said in a statement to Law360 on Monday that the union won't "rest until XPO is brought to justice."

    "We had a clear majority of support among XPO's courageous workers, but XPO refused to recognize the union and instead delayed the process and violated the law with impunity through its egregious unfair labor practices," according to the statement.

    Representatives for STG Cartage did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday.

    The Teamsters are represented by Julie Gutman Dickinson, Jason Wojciechowski and Hector De Haro of Bush Gottlieb.

    STG is represented by Michael Marino, Marshall Babson, Elliot Fink, Holger Besch and Jennifer Mora of Seyfarth Shaw LLP.

    The case is International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 848 and Local 542 and STG Cartage LLC dba XPO Logistics, case number 21-RC-289115, before the National Labor Relations Board.

    --Editing by Neil Cohen.​
  • Jazzman
    Member
    • Mar 2023
    • 88

    #2
    Careful what you wish for. That had to be an embarrassing vote count.

    The laws about independent contractors are very unfair and make organizing next to impossible. Local 848 has been trying to change the situation for Port drivers for a long time.

    Thanks for posting this, as I don't have a Law 360 account.

    Comment

    • Faust
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2023
      • 766

      #3
      Isn't Eric Tate the head of that ports division? Didn't he replace Ron Herrera as the new Port Director?

      This is an embarrassing loss for Sean O'Brien.

      Comment

      • Sasquatch16
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2023
        • 104

        #4
        I don’t understand how it’s Sean’s fault that Local 848/542 ran an election and lost. Ultimately it falls on the Local for running that election. Locals are autonomous, the IBT is just there to assist if requested.

        Comment

        • Fudd
          Member
          • Jan 2023
          • 45

          #5
          O’Brien is the face of the Teamsters and ran on the promise of increasing membership saying it was a serious issue and a major concern. Anytime an election is taking place about Teamster representation he should be DIRECTLY involved. Stop making excuses for a 20 year loyal Hoffacer.

          Comment

          • Sasquatch16
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2023
            • 104

            #6
            So locals should lose their autonomy? We should let the IBT dictate everything? Its hard for 1 person to be at 348 different places at once. That’s how many Teamster Locals there are by the way.

            Comment

            • The Direct Line
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2023
              • 110

              #7
              Very interesting article. Without knowing the details of how all this came about, we know that all you need to file for an election is 30% of the workforce. So probably locals 848 and 542 just got the minimum of 30%. Locals can not settle for getting 30% of authorized signatures, we need to strive for at least 60%

              Comment

              • David Brad Bishop
                Member
                • Jan 2023
                • 28

                #8
                Originally posted by Faust
                Isn't Eric Tate the head of that ports division? Didn't he replace Ron Herrera as the new Port Director?

                This is an embarrassing loss for Sean O'Brien.
                I believe O'brien dissolved the Port Division.

                Comment

                • Faust
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2023
                  • 766

                  #9
                  There's been campaigns where we've gotten over 80% signatures and when the workers voted barely 54% did so to join the union.

                  The union should not even try to push for a vote if under 80% do not sign.

                  Comment


                  • The Direct Line
                    The Direct Line commented
                    Editing a comment
                    Totally in agreement. You need to have an engaged supermajority.
                • BurnedbyO'Brien
                  Member
                  • Jan 2023
                  • 77

                  #10
                  Locals have autonomy with the IBT until they don't. O'Brien is making sure that those that didn't support him no longer have autonomy and finding ways to harass, strong-arm and retaliate against those Locals. It's happening all over the country. And yes, he should have been involved with this organizing campaign because he campaigned on organizing port drivers and has given many speeches over the years about organizing XPO. But incase you haven't been paying attention, O'Brien really doesn't care about anything but UPS and getting even with those that dare to stand up to him or his minions.

                  Comment


                  • working396
                    working396 commented
                    Editing a comment
                    From what I'm seeing folks are paying attention but laying low. It takes some time for word to get around.
                X
                Working...